1.) of course x=x
2.) but also x=y
3.) wich can be seen as (x=y)=z
4.) so than simply put; z
5.) and if z=god than the questions is
6.) Z?
neh?
x is a simble in math used to represent eny #. #'s represent a measure of some sort. 2 apples, 2 inches, or 2 min. so #=noun, as z=god, but the key similarity is (the same as) or (=)
1.) so enything is the same thing as enything
or to complicate things
2.) enything is the same thing as enything else.
wich is like saying carma or balence or ying yang.
3.) so if enything is the same thing as enything you could just say everything
4.) or you could just say god
5.) and if you represent god as a simbol than the question is
6.) Z?
this idea came to me with the argument that i had with a leader who seems like a wize individual, but is not respected as one. so what he says he is not nessisarily able to apply. enywho. he stated that god has universal standards that go down to the core and 'chaos' has no standard so it cannot exist. well this argument has to do with destroying what he considerd standard. first of all. if you lay your wallet out in some villages, it will remain untuched for a week becouse it dose not belong to the people of that villege. but in some plases you will be skaleped becouse of your diffrent skin color before you get a chance to lay your wallet out. were is the similar standard there? not the point. point is, standard is a tool created by man to better comunicate. just becouse some of our modern 'standards' seem so concreet, dose not mean that they are solid. a man who is 6 feet tall, may also be 72 inches tall. and 72 dose not equil 6. or he could be 493872 boo boo's tall. i just compleatly made that up. so in order for my 493872 boo boo's to be the same thing as your 6 feet, than we must assume we are talking about the same diffrence in points. but that is just an assumption. that is a perspective, wich cannot be used to conferm or deny enything. such as time. becouse you say 10 min, and i assume to know what you mean, dose not mean that the 10 min actually exist. it is an assumption of patterns. but patterns may or may not be perfect. the only way to know is to comprehend the entire pattern all at once. wich is to say comprehend infananty. wich is impossible. (well unless you die, but thats just a belife)
so than if you say something rediculous like x, you are implying eny set of so called 'standerds' to the table. x could be enything. and when you say 'the same as' you are simply using logic to figure out the world around you. so, as a member of the swich army knife (SAK) said long ago, math is essentually mans attempt at being god.
NOTE: the applications of this theory have yet to be aplied and tested, so this remains a shaky theory at best till i put a little more experamentation into it. your welcome to try applying it and post your results here. i would think thats cool, but than again its not about me, its about you. well if your reading this it is. becouse writing it is about me, but not the point. i like comments is what im trying to say.
Monday, October 11, 2010
Sunday, October 3, 2010
love drunk again
love drunk love drunk, why have you me?
all i really wanted was to be happy.
and now i cant really think clearly.
am i happy or am i sad?
is what i am doing good or bad?
it seems i lost the clarity i once had.
forward! forward! forward! i seem to recall.
the rules i set for when i begin to fall
just by being me i should be alright after all.
love drunk love drunk, take me away!
i have not a reason to ceep you at bay
i can bear the troubles, so that i can openly say
i love you.
all i really wanted was to be happy.
and now i cant really think clearly.
am i happy or am i sad?
is what i am doing good or bad?
it seems i lost the clarity i once had.
forward! forward! forward! i seem to recall.
the rules i set for when i begin to fall
just by being me i should be alright after all.
love drunk love drunk, take me away!
i have not a reason to ceep you at bay
i can bear the troubles, so that i can openly say
i love you.
teaching little eaight
well little eight, there isnt much i can tell you about the golden time. all i know is that my father was able to give you the life you have now by carefull training and combining of all the talents and tecnology of the time. i do remember bits and pieces before the decay began. and yes they are quite fond memories. yes my mother really was as beutifull as the stories say. well now are you going to ceep asking questions or let me get on with my story?
enywho, back then, my father would always take me on trips into the woods just for fun. some times it would be just me and him, othertimes it would be the whole family. during the day i met with very many other kids my age in a building called school. that was were we learned to do things that really had no purpose or intention that i can see. but evan though i resisted like a hare in a trap, he would always make me go, saying that its not the content that was important, but the process, and that i should have fun trying my hardest instead of hiding from the work. being that i didnt like 'school' very much, whenever your great grandfather said "sattle up son, its time to run!" i knew i was in for another adventure away from the funny smelling class rooms and odd looking adults.
it was on these little adventrues that he tought me all the things that you know how to do semingly naturally. you see, when i was growing up, the grocierystores had glass in all the windows and all the isles were filled with as much food as you could fill into your basket. the men of great granpas age did not know evan how to skin a rabbit, or 'lay low'. enybody from eny corner of the would could instantly communicate with eny other person, enywhere else in the world. and within one day, you could be enywere in the world. you would think, that with the amount of power that every person had, someone would be able to save the world from itself but that was not the case. your grandfather tried to talk to people, and tell them that they were going the rong way with this power but no one wanted to listen. now you listen closly child. it wasnt becouse a bad man took too much power for himself, but becouse so many people had so much power that no one cared to do enything at all.
father always tought me that i could have enything i wanted, but i had to think of it first, than i had to work hard for it making shure that i cept the people i loved happy along the way. he said that the world had forgotten the three things that had built the mountans of glass and steel. the first was that people fogot how to be resposible, always thinking that the problems belong to someone else. next, since so much was possible in the world, the old technological masters forgot what it was to dream about things. for instance becouse they know exactly what the stars are, they forgot how amazing it is just to look at them. and last, when everything you want is given to you, you dont know how to get it yourself. your forget what it means to work.
becouse of all these things, the leaders of man became confused within themselvs forgetting that if they take from thier position, but forget to steer, the world would run blind and eventually forget were it was going in the first place. and the every day man forgot that the leaders were men just like themselvs, not magical creatures capible of reviving a system from natural decay. so they watched. most every tecnological master sat in his thrown, peering into the windows of the the world from one spot, saying how terrible it was that no one was doing enything.
now little eight, man must start once again from the begining. we can try as hard as we may to remember what happend to the men of great grandfaters age. but after all we all have to find our own answers, thats the single challenge that makes being a man so great.
enywho, back then, my father would always take me on trips into the woods just for fun. some times it would be just me and him, othertimes it would be the whole family. during the day i met with very many other kids my age in a building called school. that was were we learned to do things that really had no purpose or intention that i can see. but evan though i resisted like a hare in a trap, he would always make me go, saying that its not the content that was important, but the process, and that i should have fun trying my hardest instead of hiding from the work. being that i didnt like 'school' very much, whenever your great grandfather said "sattle up son, its time to run!" i knew i was in for another adventure away from the funny smelling class rooms and odd looking adults.
it was on these little adventrues that he tought me all the things that you know how to do semingly naturally. you see, when i was growing up, the grocierystores had glass in all the windows and all the isles were filled with as much food as you could fill into your basket. the men of great granpas age did not know evan how to skin a rabbit, or 'lay low'. enybody from eny corner of the would could instantly communicate with eny other person, enywhere else in the world. and within one day, you could be enywere in the world. you would think, that with the amount of power that every person had, someone would be able to save the world from itself but that was not the case. your grandfather tried to talk to people, and tell them that they were going the rong way with this power but no one wanted to listen. now you listen closly child. it wasnt becouse a bad man took too much power for himself, but becouse so many people had so much power that no one cared to do enything at all.
father always tought me that i could have enything i wanted, but i had to think of it first, than i had to work hard for it making shure that i cept the people i loved happy along the way. he said that the world had forgotten the three things that had built the mountans of glass and steel. the first was that people fogot how to be resposible, always thinking that the problems belong to someone else. next, since so much was possible in the world, the old technological masters forgot what it was to dream about things. for instance becouse they know exactly what the stars are, they forgot how amazing it is just to look at them. and last, when everything you want is given to you, you dont know how to get it yourself. your forget what it means to work.
becouse of all these things, the leaders of man became confused within themselvs forgetting that if they take from thier position, but forget to steer, the world would run blind and eventually forget were it was going in the first place. and the every day man forgot that the leaders were men just like themselvs, not magical creatures capible of reviving a system from natural decay. so they watched. most every tecnological master sat in his thrown, peering into the windows of the the world from one spot, saying how terrible it was that no one was doing enything.
now little eight, man must start once again from the begining. we can try as hard as we may to remember what happend to the men of great grandfaters age. but after all we all have to find our own answers, thats the single challenge that makes being a man so great.
in my room
sitting and looking all around me
sorounded by suggestions at memory
memory of things lost
memory of poor investments
memories of good times
memories of strong friendships
the world i live in and the life i lead
is shown by all the things around me
is all that i see
what i have wanted to be?
am i going
were i want to go?
will i be able to acheve
all my hopes and dreams?
for me for now i say yes
and i have my life to determan the rest.
sorounded by suggestions at memory
memory of things lost
memory of poor investments
memories of good times
memories of strong friendships
the world i live in and the life i lead
is shown by all the things around me
is all that i see
what i have wanted to be?
am i going
were i want to go?
will i be able to acheve
all my hopes and dreams?
for me for now i say yes
and i have my life to determan the rest.
Saturday, August 28, 2010
Road Map to Utopia
love every one you see, evan if it isnt easy, or if they dont love you back.
be honest, espessially with yourself.
dont cause hurt intentionally
work hard
ceep going forward.
there will be obsticals in your way, go over under or through.
if that dosent work back up and find another way
pick up things you need
leave the things you dont
keep going forward roughly 65 years
do a 180 and your there.
ps: i love you
be honest, espessially with yourself.
dont cause hurt intentionally
work hard
ceep going forward.
there will be obsticals in your way, go over under or through.
if that dosent work back up and find another way
pick up things you need
leave the things you dont
keep going forward roughly 65 years
do a 180 and your there.
ps: i love you
Sunday, July 25, 2010
(20 letters)
on a mid summer night
under an early full moon
i gaze at the stars
thinking of you
all the good times shared
all the nights that didnt last
all the friends we've charished
and the time that has passed
love is a word i freely use
(evan if you find it hard to)
but i use it for you
to state an apreciation
of these memories i ponder
in wonder of growth and progresion
a silent mental hug
is this meaning of love
that friends cannot convey
just the capible can enjoy
thank you for being my friend
under an early full moon
i gaze at the stars
thinking of you
all the good times shared
all the nights that didnt last
all the friends we've charished
and the time that has passed
love is a word i freely use
(evan if you find it hard to)
but i use it for you
to state an apreciation
of these memories i ponder
in wonder of growth and progresion
a silent mental hug
is this meaning of love
that friends cannot convey
just the capible can enjoy
thank you for being my friend
Tuesday, July 6, 2010
epic apology
i have an apology to go out to all of the people who read this blog (if there are eny). i have not been able to ceep up with the whole blogging thing in my current lifestile. if i were to have more external influence or a groupe of people who were wondering things as well, i would be able to ponder things of thier intelagence and put that agiainst mine to come up with more clever little ideas. so for now i am going to get rid of the weekly promis and just post whenever i get a chance to. i have also strayed away from the wordly wonderings and wondered into more visual expression in wich has put me in a writers slump due to time.
how i long to be
with people like me
who lie in wonder
and love to ponder
bout nothing at all.
pleas o pleas my good friend
dont let the drink see all nights end
for the cheap tricks and self mutalation
cannot compare to the victorious sensation
of shit well done.
i belive animals dont create or comprehend music becouse they have absolutly no concept of the illuision of time. after all, painting is to the second dimention as sculpture is the the third and music is to the fourth. Arguments? comments? concerns?
*refer to the song 'Car Crash' by Cloud Cult* i sometimes like to say that i live in a car crash.. well try to enywhat. wich is to say that i love with without regret and apreciate all the little sensations that fill our waking life. but! is this always a good thing? at what cost am i content? who's patient sceme have i upturned? arguments? comments? concerns? randomness?
ideas?
pah! you people are useless!
how i long to be
with people like me
who lie in wonder
and love to ponder
bout nothing at all.
pleas o pleas my good friend
dont let the drink see all nights end
for the cheap tricks and self mutalation
cannot compare to the victorious sensation
of shit well done.
i belive animals dont create or comprehend music becouse they have absolutly no concept of the illuision of time. after all, painting is to the second dimention as sculpture is the the third and music is to the fourth. Arguments? comments? concerns?
*refer to the song 'Car Crash' by Cloud Cult* i sometimes like to say that i live in a car crash.. well try to enywhat. wich is to say that i love with without regret and apreciate all the little sensations that fill our waking life. but! is this always a good thing? at what cost am i content? who's patient sceme have i upturned? arguments? comments? concerns? randomness?
ideas?
pah! you people are useless!
Monday, June 21, 2010
her?
There is a fire in her heart,
A passion, a powerfull soul.
Totally perpendicular to my being, my color
In the most spectacular way.
When I'm with her, my heart sores,
like victory
All my means of comprehension are renderd useless
As I struggle to uderstand so I can perdict my next move.
Such a rush is this totall lack of controll
As I masokistically desire more of this unique relation.
At totall lost of what to say or how to act
I am forced to be honest and myself to remain constant.
Wheiter or not this feeling is mutual
It's natural, and dose not necisarily ask for trust.
Folowing my desires, my only true santuary.
I ask to share space with such a beautiful being.
A passion, a powerfull soul.
Totally perpendicular to my being, my color
In the most spectacular way.
When I'm with her, my heart sores,
like victory
All my means of comprehension are renderd useless
As I struggle to uderstand so I can perdict my next move.
Such a rush is this totall lack of controll
As I masokistically desire more of this unique relation.
At totall lost of what to say or how to act
I am forced to be honest and myself to remain constant.
Wheiter or not this feeling is mutual
It's natural, and dose not necisarily ask for trust.
Folowing my desires, my only true santuary.
I ask to share space with such a beautiful being.
Wednesday, June 16, 2010
The Man (letter)
Ok, sorry y'all for not posting on time. I'm kinda out of town with no com, this is being done from my phone. So! This is an old Emil I sent to to a frien of mine. Enjoy!
The man
it seems that you are talking about one of my major problems with life. the "resposible adult" or as the hippies would say, 'the man'. responcibility is quite alot alike that chain around your ankle or cliping the wings of a bird so he will stay still to hatch his eggs. the path that i want to find is one that avoids most of the main responcibility's. maby by cutting off one of those legs? meaning i do with out a fancy cell phone or a nice car? i too want a life where things happen. but at what cost? there is a security in the foundations of the modern adult, but what do you pay for those securities? i also belive the answer is freedom. so what do you do without to obtain that freedome? the kids? the wife? the car and house? the education? or is there a way we could find that we can ceep it all? what would that cost? time, effort, common sence, and the ability to think out of the box, and the courage to do what is diffrent. (i know! (eurika moment)). we have to always be challenging ourselfs. we cant get cought in what is confortible. we have to always be trying to ceep some opposition infront of us. this is a cost most people dont want to pay! but thats were we are diffrent, we delight in this opposition. metafore: most people who play life tetras want only so many rows of blocs, once they have figured out where to put these blocks they stop the blocks from comming down and do with the neat little box they have created. but not me and not you. we never wan those blocks to stop falling. bring us more! pick up the pace! and as we ceep eliminating rows, we find more and more saticfaction. at the cost of reaching the top we will never halt the oncomming blocks. and if we do fail the game, we will not be disrought, we will simply start agin. :end metifore. lets re relate this to the practical world of fightng the man. how do we ceep chalenging our selfs? what brave new venture do we set out upon, yet still ceep all the sub goals in mind (the wife kids house and car)? well i dont know, but i have a cupla ideas. and this is the beginning of what i mentiond above.
The man
it seems that you are talking about one of my major problems with life. the "resposible adult" or as the hippies would say, 'the man'. responcibility is quite alot alike that chain around your ankle or cliping the wings of a bird so he will stay still to hatch his eggs. the path that i want to find is one that avoids most of the main responcibility's. maby by cutting off one of those legs? meaning i do with out a fancy cell phone or a nice car? i too want a life where things happen. but at what cost? there is a security in the foundations of the modern adult, but what do you pay for those securities? i also belive the answer is freedom. so what do you do without to obtain that freedome? the kids? the wife? the car and house? the education? or is there a way we could find that we can ceep it all? what would that cost? time, effort, common sence, and the ability to think out of the box, and the courage to do what is diffrent. (i know! (eurika moment)). we have to always be challenging ourselfs. we cant get cought in what is confortible. we have to always be trying to ceep some opposition infront of us. this is a cost most people dont want to pay! but thats were we are diffrent, we delight in this opposition. metafore: most people who play life tetras want only so many rows of blocs, once they have figured out where to put these blocks they stop the blocks from comming down and do with the neat little box they have created. but not me and not you. we never wan those blocks to stop falling. bring us more! pick up the pace! and as we ceep eliminating rows, we find more and more saticfaction. at the cost of reaching the top we will never halt the oncomming blocks. and if we do fail the game, we will not be disrought, we will simply start agin. :end metifore. lets re relate this to the practical world of fightng the man. how do we ceep chalenging our selfs? what brave new venture do we set out upon, yet still ceep all the sub goals in mind (the wife kids house and car)? well i dont know, but i have a cupla ideas. and this is the beginning of what i mentiond above.
Wednesday, June 9, 2010
the artistic state
it is a commen concept that as humans we only use about 10% of our brains at one point in time. and of course there is great potential for someone who can access more of there brain at once. but with out some magical pill, how is this obtained. atholetes and artists refere to 'being in the zone' when they are practicing thier spacific trade, and if you ask one of them they normally claim that being 'in the zone' is a pleasing expreince. exuse my lack of refence, but one acting teacher calls this the artisistic state. the mindset of an actor who compleatly becomes the caricter he is trying to convey. i have found that the feeling of being in the artistic state when i was acting was verry similer to the fealings of sparring, or painting, or trying to frame the perfect shot with photography. i have not gotten into too many mainstream sports, but i imagin that pro athelets experience something similar.
another state of mind i am trying to better understand is the idea of 'feeling' things as opposed to thinking them. for some reason when i am using this whole feeling aproch to understanding i almost feel it in my chest. simmilar feelings come from using the buddist third eye, or when i was a christian, praying to god. and to me it seems like a diffrent level of the artistic state accessed not by a specific moment but just by thinking/'feeling' about something.
so the way my theory works is this. the artistic state is when you are accessing a larger persentege of your brain at one point of time. for instance, when you are trying to understand a person with this artistic state, you are turning off the inner monolog of words and accessing all of your memories of that person in order to come up with grand conclusions. or that moment in baseball where you are waiting for that pitcher to throw the ball. or in a fight where your mind seems almost compleatly blank and you are reacting to everything on the moment entirely. or one of my favorits, in video games were reaction times reach higher than normaly possible. so! if you were to be able to somhow master the artistic state, you would be an expert at almost everything you do. and evan if you are not smarter than the man next to you, you can still put out more brain power. i have found personally that this artistic state and that moment of aha! when something is understood, feels great! it is extreamly stimulating and defanatly leaves you wanting more.
another state of mind i am trying to better understand is the idea of 'feeling' things as opposed to thinking them. for some reason when i am using this whole feeling aproch to understanding i almost feel it in my chest. simmilar feelings come from using the buddist third eye, or when i was a christian, praying to god. and to me it seems like a diffrent level of the artistic state accessed not by a specific moment but just by thinking/'feeling' about something.
so the way my theory works is this. the artistic state is when you are accessing a larger persentege of your brain at one point of time. for instance, when you are trying to understand a person with this artistic state, you are turning off the inner monolog of words and accessing all of your memories of that person in order to come up with grand conclusions. or that moment in baseball where you are waiting for that pitcher to throw the ball. or in a fight where your mind seems almost compleatly blank and you are reacting to everything on the moment entirely. or one of my favorits, in video games were reaction times reach higher than normaly possible. so! if you were to be able to somhow master the artistic state, you would be an expert at almost everything you do. and evan if you are not smarter than the man next to you, you can still put out more brain power. i have found personally that this artistic state and that moment of aha! when something is understood, feels great! it is extreamly stimulating and defanatly leaves you wanting more.
Monday, May 31, 2010
on love and friendship
what is love? what is Frienship? these are two common questions without answers. or everyone seems to have thier own answers. becouse i dont belive in selflessness, i had to come up with some anser to the 'feeling' i have for those around me based on my experences. the anwer i came up with for the question of love is this: Love for another individual is when thier fealings or mood directly affect your own. wich is to say when thier happy, you are happy. when they experence success you, in some way, feel successfull as well. this i belive is the basic defanition of love. than what is hate? well hate is accually not the opposit of love, it is the same thing just reversed. so: Hate for another individual is when thier fealings or mood directly affect your own. such as when they are happy you are upset, and when they are discoureged you are satisfied. but hate is a little diffrent becouse it seems that weither they are happy or sad, you will probibly be discontent regardless. but i dont like dealing in negitives so i will continue on the love portion.
take a mothers love for thier child. this is said to be the truest form of love for some reason or another. and this defanition still aplies to the mother. little joey grows up to be successfull and mother is proud for him. or little joey gets a broken heart and mother feels bad for him and seeks to confort him. now becouse we are all individuals, honest love like that is difficult to repeat for someone who is not of kin. but it is possible. dude A and dude B share a common love. evan though this unsaid in the relationship it still works the same way. the reason this is difficult is becouse we exsist only in our own heads, letting our moods be affected by every one around us would cause for much emotional ups and downs. its so much tollerable to not be affected by everyones life and to just be indifferent to thier doings. what is to gain/lose than for loving another? well if the desired state of mind is one that is 'happy', than loving people who also desire 'happyness' can contribute to ceeping the realtionship a 'happy' one. if dude A loses his job and is discoureged, than dude B also feels this discouregment. so in desire to set himself back to a positive mindset, he seeks to bring dude A back up to positive aswell. thus resulting in both parties spending more time positive.
now onto the second topic, friendship. it would be too easy to say friendship is love, but than why use two diffrent words? yes friends love eachother, but what is the defanition of friendship? to me it seems that friendship is closer to the defanition of faith. if faith in god is to lose ones understanding to win god, than friendship is to lose ones understanding to win man. that is the word form of the defanition but i feel i need to clarify.
first lets take the first part of the phrase (by kierkegaard). to lose understanding. well to loose understanding is not to question. in one word frases it means to belive, or trust. but to go deeper it is like saying i will give up my entire quest for knowlege of the world around me. understanding something is like a nesesity for me. loosing understanding would be almost loosing my senses. my view of all that is around me. questioning everything is a way of life for me and to do without is like doing without my life. so if you are my friend, i am willing to give up my questioning nature to be closer to you. to accept you. to trust that what you do is what you do for your purposes only. like having you back against the wall, you dont have to worry about what you cannot see by elimanating it compleatly by knowing there is nothing behind you. so having a friend that you dont need to question lets you use the prosses of elimination to solve problems.
hmm... im sorry people, i dont seem to be very clear on this topic. if enyones got eny wise words of clarification feel free to say what im trying to say. i thought i understood my own notions, but it seems i need more thought on the topic. hmm... well on to the next item!
positive friendships and negitive friendships. last week i posted a poem that introduses the the two basis of friendships that i am talking about. to put the bad notions first so as to end on a better note, negitive friendships are grupes of 'frineds' who hang out and compare woes and dis eachother for humer for cheap laughs. in observation of grupes like this, i see people whose friendships are there seemingly out of the simple nesseity for friends. the compition of who can fling the biggest shit and who has the worst sob story sets up an atmosphere where ones dreams and goles are hidden from one another so they cant be used against them as fuel for the fire of laughter. individually the members of the grupe may be facinating individuals, filled with dreams, goals, and ideas that may be of use to cultivate or shared to inspire others. but becouse of the consistant atmosphere they put themselves in, those dreams fade, and those ideas forgotten. i guess the way they go about calling them selvs friends is by the assosiation of laughter amongst themselves with the time they spend together. but you will find in those grupes of friends fights, arguments, and other dishonorable and unessisary actions. the members are always on guard to defend themselvs or to send a cheap jest. an atmosphere that makes one want to just ceep silent, as to not be hurt. i belive that amonst males, this type of friendship is borne from the natural desire to be alpha male by means of compition. and the one who deals the best seres of jests gets his moment in the spotlite for that evaning or till someone takes him down. were i female i could describe that situation, but as i am not, i do not know how that works. but enough said bout negitiv based friendships.
now not all friendships are that bad or as good as what i am about to describe. most grupes of friends are probibly in the middle of them both. next time your chillen with your homies, listen to what is being said and determan what kind of friends you have.
so if that is a negitive friendship than what is a positive friendship? how is one created, and what are the benifits? at what cost? to me, positive friendships are the only form of friendship that i desire to have. these gupes of people have a relationship that i wouldent describe as happy, its better described as an atmosphere of acceptance. like enything you do is ok, and no one is going to give you a bad time about it. if a member of the negitive grupe were to join these people, as he jests, the accepting people really dont laugh as they see jests as simply unessisary. you will often find these types of grupes amonst the 'odballs' of society, and we all know what i meen. all the people who dont qute fit in with all the other clicks kinda form thier own with other people who like what they do rather than what thier friends do. so in these grupes of friends you will find an extreamly wide variety of people. your 'nerds' chillen with 'rockers' and your 'gangstas' with your 'art freaks', all chillen in one clique brought together by the accepance and apreciation they have with one another. creating an atmosphere of a positive relationship isnt something you can really plan out. first thing, cut the jests. yes they are funny, but they really dont do enything but grant the emediat self indugence of a quick laugh. one of the hardest thing about this grupe relation is to be the first to state the obvios. "hey, i really like chillen with you people becouse (____insert reason___)". at first this seems a little homosexual. and if you are in a negitive groupe, it will not be accepted at all, and you will get torn apart, evan if the others agree with you. but there is always a chance than someone else will follow you by agreeing without eny rude remark. then there follows a moment of satisfation. its kinda like the whole notion of living in the moment. depending on the degree of friendship, you will feel a level satisfation with the current situation. complimenting others on thier success and other things good you can point out dont give you laughter, but over time, that positive atmosphere turns into assosiation, and just seeing that person will bring gladness. ya know? one key point of conversation at this point is ideas. from what i have seen, not many people have them, but bring the ones you got to the table and talk about them. they can be amusing or way rad. its all good just ceep them coming.
so, now we have theroetically created a positive friendship. the cost was loss of most of the quick laughter, and the balls to state apreceation. what do we get from this? we now have an atmosphere of great mental productivity and accual trust. becouse dude A is no longer worried about what dude B is going to use against him, he is able to show more of his true self. becouse dude B knows dude A better now he can trust him more. and vice versa. as they say, two heads are better than one, and if there are eny problems or ideas that need to be worked on, they dont have to be alone. sharing you goals and dreams with another peorson can give you a diffrent angle that you might not have seen before. putting you closter to accually reaching them than you could have done on your own. if you share your past with someone, share experences with them, and your ideal future, that person now has a compleat view of who you are and want to be (desire are apart of who you are..). now that you know eachother better you can understand eachother better, and being understood is in theory the whole point of conversation! so! now enything you say will be a compleat conversation! and you will be happy.
eh. you get it. this paper is losing its touch... if it had one... but enywhat yea! think about it for a while. if you get it say so and if you have questions, ask them. if you dont, your dum.
ttfn
-Don Hearto
take a mothers love for thier child. this is said to be the truest form of love for some reason or another. and this defanition still aplies to the mother. little joey grows up to be successfull and mother is proud for him. or little joey gets a broken heart and mother feels bad for him and seeks to confort him. now becouse we are all individuals, honest love like that is difficult to repeat for someone who is not of kin. but it is possible. dude A and dude B share a common love. evan though this unsaid in the relationship it still works the same way. the reason this is difficult is becouse we exsist only in our own heads, letting our moods be affected by every one around us would cause for much emotional ups and downs. its so much tollerable to not be affected by everyones life and to just be indifferent to thier doings. what is to gain/lose than for loving another? well if the desired state of mind is one that is 'happy', than loving people who also desire 'happyness' can contribute to ceeping the realtionship a 'happy' one. if dude A loses his job and is discoureged, than dude B also feels this discouregment. so in desire to set himself back to a positive mindset, he seeks to bring dude A back up to positive aswell. thus resulting in both parties spending more time positive.
now onto the second topic, friendship. it would be too easy to say friendship is love, but than why use two diffrent words? yes friends love eachother, but what is the defanition of friendship? to me it seems that friendship is closer to the defanition of faith. if faith in god is to lose ones understanding to win god, than friendship is to lose ones understanding to win man. that is the word form of the defanition but i feel i need to clarify.
first lets take the first part of the phrase (by kierkegaard). to lose understanding. well to loose understanding is not to question. in one word frases it means to belive, or trust. but to go deeper it is like saying i will give up my entire quest for knowlege of the world around me. understanding something is like a nesesity for me. loosing understanding would be almost loosing my senses. my view of all that is around me. questioning everything is a way of life for me and to do without is like doing without my life. so if you are my friend, i am willing to give up my questioning nature to be closer to you. to accept you. to trust that what you do is what you do for your purposes only. like having you back against the wall, you dont have to worry about what you cannot see by elimanating it compleatly by knowing there is nothing behind you. so having a friend that you dont need to question lets you use the prosses of elimination to solve problems.
hmm... im sorry people, i dont seem to be very clear on this topic. if enyones got eny wise words of clarification feel free to say what im trying to say. i thought i understood my own notions, but it seems i need more thought on the topic. hmm... well on to the next item!
positive friendships and negitive friendships. last week i posted a poem that introduses the the two basis of friendships that i am talking about. to put the bad notions first so as to end on a better note, negitive friendships are grupes of 'frineds' who hang out and compare woes and dis eachother for humer for cheap laughs. in observation of grupes like this, i see people whose friendships are there seemingly out of the simple nesseity for friends. the compition of who can fling the biggest shit and who has the worst sob story sets up an atmosphere where ones dreams and goles are hidden from one another so they cant be used against them as fuel for the fire of laughter. individually the members of the grupe may be facinating individuals, filled with dreams, goals, and ideas that may be of use to cultivate or shared to inspire others. but becouse of the consistant atmosphere they put themselves in, those dreams fade, and those ideas forgotten. i guess the way they go about calling them selvs friends is by the assosiation of laughter amongst themselves with the time they spend together. but you will find in those grupes of friends fights, arguments, and other dishonorable and unessisary actions. the members are always on guard to defend themselvs or to send a cheap jest. an atmosphere that makes one want to just ceep silent, as to not be hurt. i belive that amonst males, this type of friendship is borne from the natural desire to be alpha male by means of compition. and the one who deals the best seres of jests gets his moment in the spotlite for that evaning or till someone takes him down. were i female i could describe that situation, but as i am not, i do not know how that works. but enough said bout negitiv based friendships.
now not all friendships are that bad or as good as what i am about to describe. most grupes of friends are probibly in the middle of them both. next time your chillen with your homies, listen to what is being said and determan what kind of friends you have.
so if that is a negitive friendship than what is a positive friendship? how is one created, and what are the benifits? at what cost? to me, positive friendships are the only form of friendship that i desire to have. these gupes of people have a relationship that i wouldent describe as happy, its better described as an atmosphere of acceptance. like enything you do is ok, and no one is going to give you a bad time about it. if a member of the negitive grupe were to join these people, as he jests, the accepting people really dont laugh as they see jests as simply unessisary. you will often find these types of grupes amonst the 'odballs' of society, and we all know what i meen. all the people who dont qute fit in with all the other clicks kinda form thier own with other people who like what they do rather than what thier friends do. so in these grupes of friends you will find an extreamly wide variety of people. your 'nerds' chillen with 'rockers' and your 'gangstas' with your 'art freaks', all chillen in one clique brought together by the accepance and apreciation they have with one another. creating an atmosphere of a positive relationship isnt something you can really plan out. first thing, cut the jests. yes they are funny, but they really dont do enything but grant the emediat self indugence of a quick laugh. one of the hardest thing about this grupe relation is to be the first to state the obvios. "hey, i really like chillen with you people becouse (____insert reason___)". at first this seems a little homosexual. and if you are in a negitive groupe, it will not be accepted at all, and you will get torn apart, evan if the others agree with you. but there is always a chance than someone else will follow you by agreeing without eny rude remark. then there follows a moment of satisfation. its kinda like the whole notion of living in the moment. depending on the degree of friendship, you will feel a level satisfation with the current situation. complimenting others on thier success and other things good you can point out dont give you laughter, but over time, that positive atmosphere turns into assosiation, and just seeing that person will bring gladness. ya know? one key point of conversation at this point is ideas. from what i have seen, not many people have them, but bring the ones you got to the table and talk about them. they can be amusing or way rad. its all good just ceep them coming.
so, now we have theroetically created a positive friendship. the cost was loss of most of the quick laughter, and the balls to state apreceation. what do we get from this? we now have an atmosphere of great mental productivity and accual trust. becouse dude A is no longer worried about what dude B is going to use against him, he is able to show more of his true self. becouse dude B knows dude A better now he can trust him more. and vice versa. as they say, two heads are better than one, and if there are eny problems or ideas that need to be worked on, they dont have to be alone. sharing you goals and dreams with another peorson can give you a diffrent angle that you might not have seen before. putting you closter to accually reaching them than you could have done on your own. if you share your past with someone, share experences with them, and your ideal future, that person now has a compleat view of who you are and want to be (desire are apart of who you are..). now that you know eachother better you can understand eachother better, and being understood is in theory the whole point of conversation! so! now enything you say will be a compleat conversation! and you will be happy.
eh. you get it. this paper is losing its touch... if it had one... but enywhat yea! think about it for a while. if you get it say so and if you have questions, ask them. if you dont, your dum.
ttfn
-Don Hearto
Monday, May 17, 2010
weekend
an omnipresent sound.
a contunuous irritance
masked by the controlled vibrations
of mass prodused expression
blirrd breaks from toil
and laughter from shit at shit
render useless waste of potential potential.
my dreams are learned apart by an observaition of child hood heros
the men of my youth have come clean and admitted to thier over grown childness
through expression of problems and lack of solutions
armed with active ignorence and legged with lazyness
our new man is lead by the cock and imeadeat intence self indulgences,
growing tomarows man in his likeness.
.
.
.
how i long to again compair rediculous notions
with fellow dreamers and men who enjoy the mindfull over the mindless
to dispute ideas, not relations, loving mind, not body, laughing to instences, not insults.
and most of all, acceptiong difreces, instead of that damnible practice of conformity
with fellow dreamers and men who enjoy the mindfull over the mindless
to dispute ideas, not relations, loving mind, not body, laughing to instences, not insults.
and most of all, acceptiong difreces, instead of that damnible practice of conformity
caused by the ever present compition of throwing dirt for cheep giggles.
.
.
.
i can see the faces of the touchable friends and friends enrout
a glorios voice that is more projectile than wave.
so intamit with thier own ness that it is being in the presence of another god
thier own woes are thrills allowing happieness for once.
and the hours are not in the actual couse for language.
a glorios voice that is more projectile than wave.
so intamit with thier own ness that it is being in the presence of another god
thier own woes are thrills allowing happieness for once.
and the hours are not in the actual couse for language.
Monday, May 10, 2010
casual wonder #1
do you ever feel like you want everything you own to break. like if it were all gone and not your fault, you could start anew gult free? like all the things around you are all falling apart so you have pick up the peaces and put it together. or just the opposit. like nothing around you is going aray and you wish you started off not so lucky so you could earn the things around you? or evan, you did earn everything you have but the process of working tward them was so much more saticfactory than having it? hmm...
i have a theory, that when things come down to ones true desires, working for them will be just as stimulating. but, when you accually earn what it is you are after, you will feel content and proud of your sucess. and the things around you will resemble the qualities in yourself. like your rewards were accually yours all along. hmm... i guess ill have to see what i can make out of life.
i have a theory, that when things come down to ones true desires, working for them will be just as stimulating. but, when you accually earn what it is you are after, you will feel content and proud of your sucess. and the things around you will resemble the qualities in yourself. like your rewards were accually yours all along. hmm... i guess ill have to see what i can make out of life.
Monday, May 3, 2010
existance
there was a period of time were i was struggeling with religion. before this i was a christian and before that i was sooper devout but slowly started to think and comprehend more and more as i got older. why morals? why sin? why heven or hell? why jesus? why god? why exist? these were some of the questions in my head as i attended sunday school. it was some time later that i started to doubt what was being forced down my throat based on faith instead of logic. in the words of kierkegaard, "to belive is precisely to loose ones understanding to win god." to loose understanding is something i was simply not willing to do. now having based my life on this thing called faith and seemingly suddenly it was not there, i was at loss to say the least. well it is in the nature of man to have something to cling on to and this natural instinkt is something i was still holding onto.
than the wonderfull thought came to my head, what if there was no reason for the being of man? this thought what extreamly usefull to me. the way i see it, if there is no real reason, than arnt we essentually free to do as we wish? for instance take a racing based vidio game. the designers of this game took it apon themselfs to design an abstract and amazing soroundings for you to pilot or drive your vehicle. having no goal or objective essentually gives you the time to explore all the wonderfull graffics. (all moral obligations to be described at a later date) for instance take a racing based vidio game. the designers of this game took it apon themselfs to design an abstract and amazing soroundings for you to pilot or drive your vehicle. having no goal or objective essentually gives you the time to explore all the wonderfull graffics. and evan in the vidio game you are restricted to the limitations of your craft in wich you are suposed to compleat the race. eh, you get the point and enywhat,i digress. this concept/idea was increadably uplifting for me as it alloud me to be whoever i wanted to be, it let me be myself, without the donting task of living up to a god. while this was good, i needed something a bit more to describe my exestence.
so i went to the very begining, wich was simply confirming that i do exist. thats a pritty simple task is it not? the frase "i think therefore i am", said by Rene Descartes came to mind. at the time i could not think of who accually came up with that phrase but it seemed appropirat for the explanation of my existance. so that was good. i had something to work with. it is appropirat to point out that this defanition did not tell me how i came to exist, in what means i existed, or if there was enything but me in existance. but it was a starting point.
so the next step is to define the world as i see it. or sence it. we understand our soroundings through our five sences. but our sences are just electronical singnals organized into memories within our own heads. so how do we explain this. following Descartes's example i came up with the phrase, "you have a name, therefore you are". by name i mean that i can describe you through one of my five sences. and i dont mean you as in your person. i mean everything i can see feel hear smell and taste. for instance this chair that im sitting in now. i call it a chair. or i can call it wood with faboric and padding. or i can call it [insert correct cemical components here]. so in short, it exists becouse i can specify it within my relm of thought. all actions thoughts people places and things can be described in the same mannor.
so now, i exist and everthing around me exists aswell. this is wonderfull i think. so now what do i call this mutual existance? GOD!
than the wonderfull thought came to my head, what if there was no reason for the being of man? this thought what extreamly usefull to me. the way i see it, if there is no real reason, than arnt we essentually free to do as we wish? for instance take a racing based vidio game. the designers of this game took it apon themselfs to design an abstract and amazing soroundings for you to pilot or drive your vehicle. having no goal or objective essentually gives you the time to explore all the wonderfull graffics. (all moral obligations to be described at a later date) for instance take a racing based vidio game. the designers of this game took it apon themselfs to design an abstract and amazing soroundings for you to pilot or drive your vehicle. having no goal or objective essentually gives you the time to explore all the wonderfull graffics. and evan in the vidio game you are restricted to the limitations of your craft in wich you are suposed to compleat the race. eh, you get the point and enywhat,i digress. this concept/idea was increadably uplifting for me as it alloud me to be whoever i wanted to be, it let me be myself, without the donting task of living up to a god. while this was good, i needed something a bit more to describe my exestence.
so i went to the very begining, wich was simply confirming that i do exist. thats a pritty simple task is it not? the frase "i think therefore i am", said by Rene Descartes came to mind. at the time i could not think of who accually came up with that phrase but it seemed appropirat for the explanation of my existance. so that was good. i had something to work with. it is appropirat to point out that this defanition did not tell me how i came to exist, in what means i existed, or if there was enything but me in existance. but it was a starting point.
so the next step is to define the world as i see it. or sence it. we understand our soroundings through our five sences. but our sences are just electronical singnals organized into memories within our own heads. so how do we explain this. following Descartes's example i came up with the phrase, "you have a name, therefore you are". by name i mean that i can describe you through one of my five sences. and i dont mean you as in your person. i mean everything i can see feel hear smell and taste. for instance this chair that im sitting in now. i call it a chair. or i can call it wood with faboric and padding. or i can call it [insert correct cemical components here]. so in short, it exists becouse i can specify it within my relm of thought. all actions thoughts people places and things can be described in the same mannor.
so now, i exist and everthing around me exists aswell. this is wonderfull i think. so now what do i call this mutual existance? GOD!
Monday, April 26, 2010
jesus vs lucifer
first off, i would like to set a disclamer in place. the folowing views are just a casual wonder. i do not belive in the christian god or the christian devil. so, in my opinion that war never took place. this paper is written under the assumption that it did take place for the stories sake.
there are alot of interesting stories told when refrenceing the Holy Bible. some of them define richosness and some fo them damn one for one's actions. and some tell the story of the biginning and prophosize the end. there are great wars, and thousans of years of peace. it gives you the meaning of life and punishes you for misbehavior. this book is one of the most powerfull objects ever known to man. than, it is said, it must have come from god. that much power could not have been from man. the oldest history book ever recorded. but! isnt history written by the victors? in all of our history books of the modern age, dosent the looser of the wars look like some evil villan? one will write about all the evil the things the enamy did, while casually forgetting the sins of the victor. ect. ect. yes this is common knowlage, but how dose it relate to the bible?
i say this, is the bible not just recorded events and insporational moments? it is said that god inspired the athors of the book to write what they did. well here is the punch line, what if it was a godly being but not the love based god the christians speak of? what if it was the 'devil' who inspired those individuals?
well thats not possible, there was a war in the begining of time. jesus vs lucifer and jesus won that war and the devil was cast down to hell. well lets take a step back from this anchent telling and look at it from a nutral and stratigic point of view. a bunch of people are down here on earth and the top is deciding how best to run the show down there. being y says hey, let them go down there just to get thier bodies, look around, than come back. than being z says, no, lets give them choices while thier down there. so they find thier own meanings and create thier own happiness. well being y punches being z in the face and they decide to have an epic war. the victor of this war would be able to have more controll and a greater influence of the people stuck on earth. well being z looses this war and gets put back stage becouse he was getting annoying. now, says being y, how do i get the people to do what i want?
now lets compare the desires of each of the godly beings:
being y: power, controll, influence, respect, and a good show with lots of killing.
being z: the people to find happieness and contentness on thier own
ok, well being y is not a stupid being. he might have a temper (noha and that one rainy month) but he was no fool. he knew how to get what he wanted. and what is more powerfull than faith? "to belive is precisely to loose ones understanding to win god." -kierkegaard. faith is what he wanted from the poor little people on this big big world. if he could somehow get the people to be faithfull to him, he could get them to do whatever he wanted. he could get them to go to war. he could get them to bow to him. he could take moments of thier lives away for himself and in honor of himself. he could get them to refrain from things they want and to devote thier entire lives to him. he can ceep them from finding the truth in things by having them focus on somthing he can make seem so real. they will not need to question enything, he will provide the answers, and as long as he is giving the answers he can have them know whatever he feels like.
ok so that sounds good to being y. now he has to figure out how to get the people to have faith in them so he can lead them from the truth in things. and eny one with eny intelagence knows that leading with 'love' will forever be more powerfull than leading with fear. so now our godly being y, with alot of time to spare, has to figure out how to make the people love him. it is also known that people, with thier simple minds, will come together when presented with a common enamy. so now our godly being y, has to find something he can make the bad guy. finnaly, people work alot harder if they know they get something out of it. so our godly being y, has to offer something the people want at the cost of thier life (/choices/free will/soul (note:see other philosofies)).
well our intelagant being y figured this wont be too difficult to do. so he sais that he will give the people everything they want for thier 100 years on earth and called it hevan. he tells the people they will have every single desire of thier heart and not only will there be no pain, but there will be only happieness! i mean, instead of offering something he offerd everything!(i wish i could offersomthing as foolish as that and get people to do shit for me). than he points a figure at our almost forgotten godly being z, gives him the name 'devil' and tells the people of all the bad things that he did and wants to do. now the last little teckique was a bit trickyer. so what he did was give himself the name 'jesus' and started a religion promesing peace and whatever the people whanted at the cost of thier life. he also called himself varios other things becouse the people did not all speak the same language.
so what kind of world did 'jesus' create? it is a world were the majority do not question what is being given to them. it is a world were people show gratitude to him for giving them everything they have. a world were people go to war in his name. build nations in his name. a world were people limit them selve based on faith, instead of finding thier own reasons.
now all this seems a bit rediculous when we compare it to our sence of reality. all that was said in the story was a little too much to be belivable. but hear is another story that accually makes sence, and can be aplicable to our world, in some ways.
there is a man named dude. dude was a simple guy and came from a simple family. but dude was sooper anilitical and totally smarter than all the people around him. so being sooper smart and having so many questions, he picks up his bags and calls the world his home. all the while he was meeting all these extrodinary people and getting into all these radical views that had to do with things that the current political situation didnt allow. one day, evan for all his intellagence, the dumbass desides to go public and gets killed becouse of it. now there are alot of people like our dude, but dude was the shit and people knew that, so they wrote books about him and things that he did, and they kinda masked some of the most radical views in storys to cover thier own assess. and times change.
so now there are a bunch of crazy ideas floating around and some dude had taken the books written about dude and put them all together and said hay! i think dude was write all along! so for some time it was good. but than people got lazy and there was no way for everyone to read that collection of books so they had really smart people read the books and tell them about it and what they ment. again times change abit more
now there is this old old story invoving some randome collection of books, all about some guy named dude. and alot of people thought these books were awsome becouse thats what thier fathers told them, and wanted to read the books for them selves. now there are two major issues with that. one, these dumbasses cant read at all and two its written in some other old language that only really really old people speak, and its hard to find people that old. now one man who happend to be in a very important political position saw that these people liked these books and used his influence (not tomention great wealth) and had the books translated into the language that the majority spoke.
now this man was not a good man and he wanted alot of power, controll, influence, and respect. he was also a very smart man and he wanted compleat controll of his people and people who thought on thier own would pose a threat to his power so while he was getting these books translated, he had a cupla things changed here and there so people would have faith. and what would people have faith in? this book. this newly translated book told people to be good and if they were good and listend to thier higherups they would get everything they wanted when they died (when they were no longer usefull). the people incharge of the translation of this book were concitered powerfull men. why? well first of all, these were some of the only people who could read. second of all they knew all the answers to the confusing riddles in the books. so as a smart person, our man of great political influence and cash money decided that he was incharge of all the smart book translators and succeded and obtaining his power, controll, influence, and respect. but than he bit the dust. and times continue to change.
alot.
and here we are with some random ass book called the bible with as many interpertations as people have imaginations, yet it is concidered to be the oldest history book known to man (history? really?).
so is it really a book of god? or is a book of man? if the bible created its ideal world, would it be a good one? or would we all just end up going to hell, and being very depresed by it? either way. in the end it is up to the individual to decide what he thinks or belives. wich is my point entirely.
there are alot of interesting stories told when refrenceing the Holy Bible. some of them define richosness and some fo them damn one for one's actions. and some tell the story of the biginning and prophosize the end. there are great wars, and thousans of years of peace. it gives you the meaning of life and punishes you for misbehavior. this book is one of the most powerfull objects ever known to man. than, it is said, it must have come from god. that much power could not have been from man. the oldest history book ever recorded. but! isnt history written by the victors? in all of our history books of the modern age, dosent the looser of the wars look like some evil villan? one will write about all the evil the things the enamy did, while casually forgetting the sins of the victor. ect. ect. yes this is common knowlage, but how dose it relate to the bible?
i say this, is the bible not just recorded events and insporational moments? it is said that god inspired the athors of the book to write what they did. well here is the punch line, what if it was a godly being but not the love based god the christians speak of? what if it was the 'devil' who inspired those individuals?
well thats not possible, there was a war in the begining of time. jesus vs lucifer and jesus won that war and the devil was cast down to hell. well lets take a step back from this anchent telling and look at it from a nutral and stratigic point of view. a bunch of people are down here on earth and the top is deciding how best to run the show down there. being y says hey, let them go down there just to get thier bodies, look around, than come back. than being z says, no, lets give them choices while thier down there. so they find thier own meanings and create thier own happiness. well being y punches being z in the face and they decide to have an epic war. the victor of this war would be able to have more controll and a greater influence of the people stuck on earth. well being z looses this war and gets put back stage becouse he was getting annoying. now, says being y, how do i get the people to do what i want?
now lets compare the desires of each of the godly beings:
being y: power, controll, influence, respect, and a good show with lots of killing.
being z: the people to find happieness and contentness on thier own
ok, well being y is not a stupid being. he might have a temper (noha and that one rainy month) but he was no fool. he knew how to get what he wanted. and what is more powerfull than faith? "to belive is precisely to loose ones understanding to win god." -kierkegaard. faith is what he wanted from the poor little people on this big big world. if he could somehow get the people to be faithfull to him, he could get them to do whatever he wanted. he could get them to go to war. he could get them to bow to him. he could take moments of thier lives away for himself and in honor of himself. he could get them to refrain from things they want and to devote thier entire lives to him. he can ceep them from finding the truth in things by having them focus on somthing he can make seem so real. they will not need to question enything, he will provide the answers, and as long as he is giving the answers he can have them know whatever he feels like.
ok so that sounds good to being y. now he has to figure out how to get the people to have faith in them so he can lead them from the truth in things. and eny one with eny intelagence knows that leading with 'love' will forever be more powerfull than leading with fear. so now our godly being y, with alot of time to spare, has to figure out how to make the people love him. it is also known that people, with thier simple minds, will come together when presented with a common enamy. so now our godly being y, has to find something he can make the bad guy. finnaly, people work alot harder if they know they get something out of it. so our godly being y, has to offer something the people want at the cost of thier life (/choices/free will/soul (note:see other philosofies)).
well our intelagant being y figured this wont be too difficult to do. so he sais that he will give the people everything they want for thier 100 years on earth and called it hevan. he tells the people they will have every single desire of thier heart and not only will there be no pain, but there will be only happieness! i mean, instead of offering something he offerd everything!(i wish i could offersomthing as foolish as that and get people to do shit for me). than he points a figure at our almost forgotten godly being z, gives him the name 'devil' and tells the people of all the bad things that he did and wants to do. now the last little teckique was a bit trickyer. so what he did was give himself the name 'jesus' and started a religion promesing peace and whatever the people whanted at the cost of thier life. he also called himself varios other things becouse the people did not all speak the same language.
so what kind of world did 'jesus' create? it is a world were the majority do not question what is being given to them. it is a world were people show gratitude to him for giving them everything they have. a world were people go to war in his name. build nations in his name. a world were people limit them selve based on faith, instead of finding thier own reasons.
now all this seems a bit rediculous when we compare it to our sence of reality. all that was said in the story was a little too much to be belivable. but hear is another story that accually makes sence, and can be aplicable to our world, in some ways.
there is a man named dude. dude was a simple guy and came from a simple family. but dude was sooper anilitical and totally smarter than all the people around him. so being sooper smart and having so many questions, he picks up his bags and calls the world his home. all the while he was meeting all these extrodinary people and getting into all these radical views that had to do with things that the current political situation didnt allow. one day, evan for all his intellagence, the dumbass desides to go public and gets killed becouse of it. now there are alot of people like our dude, but dude was the shit and people knew that, so they wrote books about him and things that he did, and they kinda masked some of the most radical views in storys to cover thier own assess. and times change.
so now there are a bunch of crazy ideas floating around and some dude had taken the books written about dude and put them all together and said hay! i think dude was write all along! so for some time it was good. but than people got lazy and there was no way for everyone to read that collection of books so they had really smart people read the books and tell them about it and what they ment. again times change abit more
now there is this old old story invoving some randome collection of books, all about some guy named dude. and alot of people thought these books were awsome becouse thats what thier fathers told them, and wanted to read the books for them selves. now there are two major issues with that. one, these dumbasses cant read at all and two its written in some other old language that only really really old people speak, and its hard to find people that old. now one man who happend to be in a very important political position saw that these people liked these books and used his influence (not tomention great wealth) and had the books translated into the language that the majority spoke.
now this man was not a good man and he wanted alot of power, controll, influence, and respect. he was also a very smart man and he wanted compleat controll of his people and people who thought on thier own would pose a threat to his power so while he was getting these books translated, he had a cupla things changed here and there so people would have faith. and what would people have faith in? this book. this newly translated book told people to be good and if they were good and listend to thier higherups they would get everything they wanted when they died (when they were no longer usefull). the people incharge of the translation of this book were concitered powerfull men. why? well first of all, these were some of the only people who could read. second of all they knew all the answers to the confusing riddles in the books. so as a smart person, our man of great political influence and cash money decided that he was incharge of all the smart book translators and succeded and obtaining his power, controll, influence, and respect. but than he bit the dust. and times continue to change.
alot.
and here we are with some random ass book called the bible with as many interpertations as people have imaginations, yet it is concidered to be the oldest history book known to man (history? really?).
so is it really a book of god? or is a book of man? if the bible created its ideal world, would it be a good one? or would we all just end up going to hell, and being very depresed by it? either way. in the end it is up to the individual to decide what he thinks or belives. wich is my point entirely.
Wednesday, April 21, 2010
First time for everything neh?
hello wold of mindless loosers scouring the web for things of minute interest instead of creating a life of your own. i am (alias) Don Hearto the creator of His Own Voice and i want to start off by stating two things.
first off. DO NOT MIND THE SPELLING! i happen to be the worst at spelling and gramatical correctness. i have tried in the past to correct myself but it is not working out for me. as i say in many things, its about the content not the esthedics. if you are the type of person to get hung up on the quality of my grammer than you will compleatly miss this next point. alot of philosiphers will get hung up on the words used to convey some dramatic concept and it is up to the reader to interporat the meaning the way that makes sence, evan if thats not accually what is written. i have faith in you reader, do not let me down!
the second item of my introduction is the name 'His Own Voice' and the idea behind it. the main statement goes like this: 'mans greatest responcibility is his own voice'. in this statement i am using voice as a synenem for soul/choices/actions/ness/(see later posts to come). so basicly you are responceble for yourself and your own life. and part of that life is learning things and coming up with your own answers. in this blog i have all sorts of ideas but i do not know everything and am currently pursuing a higher education. as i learn think and grow the quality of my words will grow aswell. so take what i have to say as an idea to twist and conform into your own worldview using your own voice. for that is what i have done.
thank you readers for your pacentce and understanding. i think we'll get along smashingly!
first off. DO NOT MIND THE SPELLING! i happen to be the worst at spelling and gramatical correctness. i have tried in the past to correct myself but it is not working out for me. as i say in many things, its about the content not the esthedics. if you are the type of person to get hung up on the quality of my grammer than you will compleatly miss this next point. alot of philosiphers will get hung up on the words used to convey some dramatic concept and it is up to the reader to interporat the meaning the way that makes sence, evan if thats not accually what is written. i have faith in you reader, do not let me down!
the second item of my introduction is the name 'His Own Voice' and the idea behind it. the main statement goes like this: 'mans greatest responcibility is his own voice'. in this statement i am using voice as a synenem for soul/choices/actions/ness/(see later posts to come). so basicly you are responceble for yourself and your own life. and part of that life is learning things and coming up with your own answers. in this blog i have all sorts of ideas but i do not know everything and am currently pursuing a higher education. as i learn think and grow the quality of my words will grow aswell. so take what i have to say as an idea to twist and conform into your own worldview using your own voice. for that is what i have done.
thank you readers for your pacentce and understanding. i think we'll get along smashingly!
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)